Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Boris's avatar

There is one huge unknown: how many of this signing bonuses are paid to really new recruits? There were references in local press (including Chechen/Kadyrov channels but not limited to them) to the volunteers who served at the front several times during the war, and every time they were recorded as new ones. It all depends on the duration of the contract. If it is relatively short-term (say, a month, or two-three months), the overall number of signing bonuses ought to be divided by an unknown coefficient, possibly larger than 2 or even 3.

Expand full comment
Torsten Baar's avatar

Assuming bonuses were not privatised, it still means Russia fails to meet its recruitment targets. To replace casualties and grow army and navy and replace retirements across whole army they would need closer to 250,000 per six month. There is a gap of several 10,000

On the other side, the army consumes now > 2/3 of a year getting 18. With all the exceptions from draft - they can not keep that over a long time. Choice will be soldiers or tanks.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts